By Amit Acco, Partner |
In recent times, we have witnessed several cases in which foreign nationals — including European politicians and humanitarian aid workers — were denied entry into Israel due to their involvement in activities deemed hostile to the state. These decisions have drawn international attention, particularly in cases where individuals were found to be promoting boycotts or engaging in campaigns aimed at delegitimizing Israel.
The Israeli border control, operating under the Ministry of Interior, retains full authority to determine who is permitted entry into the country. This sovereign right is vital for protecting national security, maintaining public order, and upholding Israel’s diplomatic and legal frameworks.
The case if Rima Hassan – A member of the European Parliament
One notable example occurred on February, 2025, when Rima Hassan, a member of the European Parliament, was refused entry into Israel. Interior Minister Moshe Arbel issued a public statement explaining the decision, stating:
“Her entry into Israel will be denied.” He further noted that Hassan “has consistently acted to promote boycotts against Israel, in addition to numerous public statements both on social media and in media interviews.” The move followed “the recommendation of the Ministry of Diaspora and the Fight against Anti-Semitism,” underscoring the coordinated effort between Israeli ministries to address foreign actions viewed as hostile.
The case of two British Members of Parliament, Yasmin Qureshi and Apsana Begum
A similar incident unfolded on April, 2025 at Ben-Gurion Airport involving two British Members of Parliament, Yasmin Qureshi and Apsana Begum. The two MPs, widely regarded as among the most outspoken critics of Israel in the UK Parliament, landed at Ben-Gurion Airport on a flight from Luton, accompanied by their aides. According to the press, upon arrival, they claimed to be part of an “official delegation,” implying a formal and diplomatic purpose for their visit. However, during questioning by Israeli border officials, it became apparent that this claim was false.
According to the Population and Immigration Authority, the true purpose of their visit was not diplomatic. Instead, the MPs had allegedly intended (according to the PIBA) to document the activities of Israeli security forces and reportedly to engage in rhetoric hostile to the state. Their prior calls for boycotts and ongoing participation in campaigns to delegitimize Israel further supported the decision to deny them entry.
The refusal sparked criticism from the British Foreign Secretary, who labeled the move “unacceptable.” Nonetheless, Israeli authorities emphasized that the decision was consistent with national policy. The government maintains that while criticism of Israel is welcome when expressed through respectful and constructive channels, it cannot permit entry to those who actively seek to harm the country’s international standing or promote incitement under the guise of advocacy or humanitarian concern.
Such measures are part of a broader approach by Israel to defend itself diplomatically, not only through international forums but also by regulating the conduct of foreign visitors whose presence may undermine national interests. The cases of Rima Hassan, Yasmin Qureshi, and Apsana Begum highlight the delicate balance Israel seeks to maintain between openness and security.
The Case of UNRWA and Humanitarian NGO’s
This pattern of entry denial extends beyond political figures to include humanitarian aid workers and employees of international organizations. In recent months, Israeli have restricted the access to staff from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and humanitarian agencies operating in the region. The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) has warned that Israel is systematically denying visas to NGO personnel.
On this issue, UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini stated that the Israeli government has “stopped giving visas” to key leaders and staff members within the humanitarian aid community, including those from organizations with “close partnerships” with the United Nations.
“Increasingly, the Government of Israel is phasing out representation from humanitarian organizations …”
KTA Recommendations
In conclusion, Israel’s message is firm: it remains committed to free expression and dialogue, but not at the expense of its sovereignty or security. Those who wish to visit the country must do so in good faith, with respect for its laws and democratic institutions. Entry into any country is not a right, but a privilege — and Israel, like all sovereign states, reserves the right to decide who may cross its borders.
At Kan-Tor & Acco (KTA), we strongly recommend that individuals who may be involved in matters related to political activism, humanitarian aid, or affiliations with organizations engaged in contentious issues concerning Israel consult with our office prior to attempting entry into the country. There are legal mechanisms available to detect potential entry concerns in advance and to proactively address them before travel.
This proactive approach can help mitigate unnecessary confusion, delays, public embarrassment, significant expenses, and, in many cases, prevent outright denial of entry at the border.
It is important to understand that once a denial decision is made by Israeli authorities, it is extremely difficult to overturn. In fact, recent legislative proposals have gone so far as to suggest stripping foreign nationals of any legal standing in Israeli courts to challenge such decisions. Early legal review and intervention can be crucial in ensuring a smooth and lawful entry process.
